Mitsubishi lancer safety rating




Mitsubishi lancer safety rating

Article Navigation:
  • Photo
  • Mitsubishi Lancer
  • Video
  • RELATED PAGES
  • The ratings of one vehicle often apply to other models if they are built on the same platform. In addition, a test of a vehicle from one model year may apply to.

    The model-year Lancer was introduced in December This ANCAP rating is based on crash tests conducted by ANCAP in

    Review the Lancer crash safety ratings from the IIHS and NHTSA to see how well passengers are protected in front, rear and side impact collisions.

    Mitsubishi lancer safety rating

    Mitsubishi lancer safety rating

    The side curtain airbag deployed but does not have sufficient forward coverage to protect the head from contact with forward side structure and outside objects, and the driver's seat tipped forward and toward the B-pillar. The force applied relative to the vehicle's weight is known as the strength-to-weight ratio. The bonnet provided poor protection in most of the areas likely to hit by an adult's head. It stops wheel spin by reducing engine power or temporarily applying the brakes to that wheel, allowing the car to accelerate smoothly, even on slippery surfaces.

    Mitsubishi lancer safety rating

    Mitsubishi lancer safety rating

    Mitsubishi lancer safety rating

    Mitsubishi lancer safety rating

    Mitsubishi lancer safety rating

    Mitsubishi Lancer Crash Test Ratings

    The photos and videos shown here may be of a different model, model year or body type from the one selected. The ratings of one vehicle often apply to other models if they are built on the same platform. In addition, a test of a vehicle from one model year may apply to earlier or later model years if the vehicle hasn't been significantly redesigned.

    The Mitsubishi Lancer was redesigned for the model year. The small overlap frontal ratings also apply to the hatchback version of the Lancer, known as the Sportback, available for the model years. The driver space was maintained reasonably well, with maximum intrusion of the lower interior of 21 cm at the lower hinge pillar. Upper interior intrusion measured cm at the hinge pillar and instrument panel. Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

    Mitsubishi lancer safety rating

    The side curtain airbag deployed but does not have sufficient forward coverage to protect the head from contact with forward side structure and outside objects, and the driver's seat tipped forward and toward the B-pillar.

    The side torso airbag deployed. How this test is conducted. Moderate overlap frontal ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Mitsubishi as part of frontal crash test verification. The frontal ratings also apply to the hatchback version of the Lancer, known as the Sportback, available for the model years. Dummy movement was well controlled. The driver side curtain airbag deployed during the crash, and the dummy's head rebounded into the side airbag without coming close to any stiff structure that could cause injury.

    Mitsubishi lancer safety rating

    The side ratings also apply to the hatchback version of the Lancer, known as the Sportback, available for the model years. Starting with models of both the sedan and hatchback, the seat-mounted side torso airbags and front door trim were modified to improve occupant protection in side impact crashes. Side ratings are assigned by the Institute based on a test conducted by Mitsubishi as part of side crash test verification.

    Because the side structure and the rear occupant compartment of the car were not changed, the injury ratings for the passenger and the structure rating are based on tests of both the original and modified models. The newly tested car was designated as a model but included the side torso airbag and door trim changes of the models.

    Driver — Measures taken from the dummy indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity. Passenger — Measures from the dummies in the two tests, taken together, indicate a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity.

    Mitsubishi lancer safety rating

    Driver — The dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof. Passenger — In both tests, the dummy's head was protected from being hit by any hard structures, including the intruding barrier, by a side curtain airbag that deployed from the roof. In the test, the strength of the roof is determined by pushing a metal plate against one side of it at a slow but constant speed.

    The force applied relative to the vehicle's weight is known as the strength-to-weight ratio. This graph shows how the ratio varied as the test of this vehicle progressed. The peak strength-to-weight ratio recorded at any time before the roof is crushed 5 inches is the key measurement of roof strength. A good rating requires a strength-to-weight ratio of at least 4. In other words, the roof must withstand a force of at least 4 times the vehicle's weight before the plate crushes the roof by 5 inches.

    2012 Mitsubishi Lancer



    • Подписаться по RSSRSS
    • Поделиться VkontakteVkontakte
    • Поделиться на FacebookFacebook
    • Твитнуть!Twitter

    Leave a Reply

    Return to Top ▲TOP ▲